CHEM 361 / Test Bank / Organometallics
0 / 0
Test Bank — Unit 4

Organometallic Chemistry

Practice problems drawn from Housecroft, Atkins, JD Lee, and others. Select an answer or click "Show Answer" to reveal the explanation.

The 18-Electron Rule

Questions 1–4
Housecroft & Sharpe, Ch. 24 Housecroft
Q1

The 18-electron rule states that thermodynamically stable organometallic complexes tend to possess a specific total valence electron count. What is that count, and what is its relationship to noble gas configuration?

  • a 8 electrons — matching the octet of main-group elements
  • b 18 electrons — filling all nine valence orbitals (one s, three p, five d) to achieve the electron count of the next noble gas
  • c 16 electrons — leaving one d orbital empty for catalytic activity
  • d 12 electrons — filling only the s and d orbitals without using p orbitals
Answer: (b)

The 18-electron rule is the transition-metal analogue of the octet rule. A transition metal has nine valence orbitals: one (n)s, three (n)p, and five (n−1)d. Filling all nine with electron pairs gives 18 electrons, which matches the electron configuration of the next noble gas (e.g., Kr for a 4d metal). Complexes obeying this rule are often kinetically inert and thermodynamically stable.

Housecroft & Sharpe, Ch. 24 Housecroft
Structure of Fe(CO)5
Fig. 24.1 — Iron pentacarbonyl, [Fe(CO)5]
Q2

Count the total valence electrons in [Fe(CO)5]. Does this complex obey the 18-electron rule?

  • a Yes — Fe contributes 8e and five CO ligands contribute 10e, totalling 18e
  • b No — Fe contributes 6e and five CO contribute 10e, totalling 16e
  • c Yes — Fe contributes 8e and five CO contribute 5e, totalling 13e
  • d No — Fe contributes 8e and five CO contribute 15e, totalling 23e
Answer: (a)

Iron is in group 8, so Fe(0) has 8 valence electrons. Each CO is a 2-electron donor (it donates its lone pair on carbon to the metal). Five CO ligands contribute 5 × 2 = 10 electrons. The total is 8 + 10 = 18 electrons. [Fe(CO)5] obeys the 18-electron rule, which explains its remarkable stability as a volatile liquid at room temperature.

Atkins & Shriver, Chapter 22 Atkins
Q3

Both [Cr(CO)6] and [Mn(CO)5] are 18-electron species. Which electron count breakdown is correct for both complexes?

  • a Cr: 5e + 12e(CO) = 17e; Mn: 7e + 10e(CO) = 17e — neither is 18e
  • b Cr: 6e + 10e(CO) = 16e; Mn: 7e + 10e(CO) + 1e(charge) = 18e — only Mn is 18e
  • c Cr: 6e + 12e(CO) = 18e; Mn: 7e + 10e(CO) + 1e(charge) = 18e — both are 18e
  • d Cr: 6e + 6e(CO) = 12e; Mn: 7e + 5e(CO) + 1e(charge) = 13e — neither is 18e
Answer: (c)

For [Cr(CO)6]: Cr is in group 6, so Cr(0) has 6 valence electrons. Six CO ligands donate 6 × 2 = 12 electrons. Total = 6 + 12 = 18e. For [Mn(CO)5]: Mn is in group 7, so Mn(0) has 7 valence electrons. Five CO ligands donate 5 × 2 = 10 electrons. The negative charge adds 1 electron. Total = 7 + 10 + 1 = 18e. These species are isoelectronic — they have the same electron count and analogous structures.

Housecroft & Sharpe, Fig. 24.2 Housecroft
Structure of ferrocene
Fig. 24.2 — The sandwich structure of ferrocene, [Fe(Cp)2]
Q4

Ferrocene, [Fe(Cp)2], is one of the most important organometallic compounds. Using the ionic model (where each Cp ring is Cp), count the valence electrons. Does ferrocene obey the 18-electron rule?

  • a Fe2+ = 4e, 2 Cp = 10e → 14e — no
  • b Fe2+ = 8e, 2 Cp = 12e → 20e — no
  • c Fe2+ = 6e, 2 Cp = 10e → 16e — no
  • d Fe2+ = 6e, 2 Cp = 12e → 18e — yes
Answer: (d)

In the ionic model, each cyclopentadienyl ring is treated as Cp, a 6-electron donor (5 carbon atoms each contributing one electron, plus the extra negative charge). Iron is assigned the +2 oxidation state: Fe2+ is d6 with 6 valence electrons. Two Cp rings donate 2 × 6 = 12 electrons. Total = 6 + 12 = 18 electrons. Ferrocene obeys the 18-electron rule, consistent with its exceptional thermal stability.

Metal Carbonyls & Bonding

Questions 5–8
Housecroft & Sharpe, Fig. 24.3 Housecroft
MO diagram showing CO sigma donation and pi back-bonding
Fig. 24.3 — Synergic bonding in metal carbonyls: σ donation and π back-bonding
Q5

When CO binds to a transition metal, the CO stretching frequency decreases from the free-ligand value of 2143 cm−1. What is the bonding explanation for this decrease?

  • a The metal removes electron density from CO through σ donation, strengthening the C≡O bond
  • b The metal donates d-electron density into the π* antibonding orbitals of CO (π back-bonding), weakening the C≡O bond
  • c CO changes from a triple bond to a double bond upon coordination due to steric strain
  • d The electrostatic attraction between the metal cation and carbon strengthens the M–C bond at the expense of the C≡O bond
Answer: (b)

Metal–CO bonding is synergic: CO donates its lone pair on carbon to an empty metal orbital (σ donation), while the metal simultaneously donates d-electron density back into the empty π* antibonding orbitals of CO (π back-bonding). Populating the π* orbitals weakens the C≡O bond, reducing its bond order from 3 toward 2 and lowering the IR stretching frequency. This is a direct, measurable signature of back-bonding.

Housecroft & Sharpe, Ch. 24 Housecroft
Q6

Rank the following species in order of decreasing CO stretching frequency: free CO, [Ni(CO)4], [Co(CO)4], [Fe(CO)4]2−.

  • a [Fe(CO)4]2− > [Co(CO)4] > [Ni(CO)4] > free CO
  • b [Ni(CO)4] > free CO > [Co(CO)4] > [Fe(CO)4]2−
  • c free CO > [Fe(CO)4]2− > [Co(CO)4] > [Ni(CO)4]
  • d free CO > [Ni(CO)4] > [Co(CO)4] > [Fe(CO)4]2−
Answer: (d)

Free CO has the highest stretching frequency (2143 cm−1) because there is no back-bonding. As the negative charge on the complex increases, the metal center becomes more electron-rich and donates more electron density into CO π* orbitals. Ni(0) in [Ni(CO)4] back-bonds less than Co(−1) in [Co(CO)4], which in turn back-bonds less than Fe(−2) in [Fe(CO)4]2−. Greater back-bonding means a weaker C≡O bond and a lower stretching frequency.

Atkins & Shriver, Chapter 22 Atkins
Q7

The isolobal analogy is a powerful concept in organometallic chemistry. Which of the following best describes this analogy?

  • a Two molecular fragments are isolobal if they have frontier orbitals of the same symmetry, similar energy, and the same number of electrons — e.g., Mn(CO)5 is isolobal with CH3
  • b Two molecules are isolobal if they have the same total number of atoms and electrons
  • c The isolobal analogy states that all transition metals behave identically to carbon
  • d Isolobal fragments must have the same charge and oxidation state
Answer: (a)

The isolobal analogy, developed by Roald Hoffmann, relates molecular fragments from organic and organometallic chemistry. Two fragments are isolobal (indicated by the double-headed arrow with a lobe, ⟷) if their frontier orbitals match in symmetry, energy, and electron occupation. For example, Mn(CO)5 has one half-filled frontier orbital pointing outward, just like CH3·. This allows prediction of bonding: since CH3–CH3 exists (ethane), (CO)5Mn–Mn(CO)5 should also form.

Housecroft & Sharpe, Fig. 24.7 Housecroft
Structure of Mn2(CO)10
Fig. 24.7 — The structure of [Mn2(CO)10]
Q8

[Mn2(CO)10] contains a direct Mn–Mn bond with no bridging carbonyls. Why does this dimer form rather than a mononuclear [Mn(CO)5] species?

  • a Mn(CO)5 has 18 electrons already, but dimerizes to achieve 36 electrons
  • b Mn(CO)5 has 16 electrons and needs two more from a bridging CO
  • c Mn(CO)5 has 17 electrons (odd count), so two fragments share an M–M bond to give each Mn an 18e count
  • d The M–M bond forms due to electrostatic attraction between positively charged Mn centers
Answer: (c)

Mn is in group 7, so Mn(0) has 7 valence electrons. Five CO ligands donate 10 electrons, giving a total of 17 electrons for the Mn(CO)5 fragment — an odd, unstable count. By forming a direct Mn–Mn bond, each Mn shares one electron with the other, bringing each metal center to 18 electrons. The structure is staggered (D4d symmetry) with no bridging carbonyls, unlike [Co2(CO)8] which has bridging CO isomers.

Organometallic Reactions

Questions 9–12
Housecroft & Sharpe, Ch. 24 Housecroft
Q9

Oxidative addition is one of the most fundamental organometallic reactions. Which of the following correctly describes what happens to the metal center during oxidative addition of H2 to Vaska's complex, trans-[IrCl(CO)(PPh3)2]?

  • a The oxidation state decreases by 2, the coordination number decreases by 2, and the electron count decreases by 2
  • b The oxidation state increases by 2 (Ir+1 → Ir+3), the coordination number increases by 2 (4 → 6), and the electron count increases by 2 (16e → 18e)
  • c The oxidation state stays the same, but two new ligands are added
  • d The oxidation state increases by 1 and the coordination number increases by 1
Answer: (b)

In oxidative addition, a substrate X–Y adds across the metal center. The metal formally inserts into the X–Y bond, breaking it and forming two new M–X and M–Y bonds. For Vaska's complex: Ir(I) (d8, 16e, 4-coordinate, square planar) adds H2 to become [IrClH2(CO)(PPh3)2] — Ir(III) (d6, 18e, 6-coordinate, octahedral). The metal is "oxidized" because it formally donates two electrons to form the new bonds.

Atkins & Shriver, Chapter 22 Atkins
Q10

Reductive elimination is the microscopic reverse of oxidative addition. Which statement best describes this process?

  • a Two cis ligands on the metal couple to form a new bond and depart; the metal's oxidation state decreases by 2, coordination number decreases by 2, and electron count decreases by 2
  • b A ligand dissociates from the metal with no change in oxidation state
  • c The metal is reduced by accepting electrons from an external reducing agent
  • d Two trans ligands combine and leave; the metal's oxidation state increases by 2
Answer: (a)

In reductive elimination, two ligands that are cis to each other on the metal couple together to form a new X–Y bond and depart as a single molecule. The metal center is formally reduced: its oxidation state decreases by 2, coordination number decreases by 2, and electron count decreases by 2. This step is critical for product-forming steps in catalytic cycles such as cross-coupling reactions (Suzuki, Heck, etc.).

Housecroft & Sharpe, Ch. 24 Housecroft
Q11

Migratory insertion of CO into an M–CH3 bond is a key step in many catalytic processes. Which description of the mechanism is correct?

  • a The CO ligand migrates to the methyl group; the overall electron count increases by 2
  • b The methyl group is ejected and then re-attacks the CO; the oxidation state changes by +2
  • c The methyl group migrates onto an adjacent coordinated CO to form an acyl (M–COCH3) ligand; a vacant coordination site is created and the electron count decreases by 2
  • d Free CO from solution inserts directly into the M–CH3 bond without any ligand rearrangement
Answer: (c)

Despite being called "CO insertion," the actual mechanism involves the methyl group migrating to a cis-coordinated CO ligand to form an acyl group (M–C(=O)CH3). This is a 1,2-shift: the alkyl migrates with its bonding electrons onto the carbon of CO. The process creates a vacant coordination site on the metal and decreases the electron count by 2, which is typically filled by an incoming ligand (often another CO from solution).

JD Lee, Chapter 29 JD Lee
Q12

β-Hydride elimination is a common decomposition pathway for metal alkyl complexes. Which of the following correctly states the structural requirement and outcome?

  • a The α-carbon must bear a hydrogen; elimination produces a metal hydride and a carbene
  • b The metal must have a 16e count; elimination produces a free alkyl radical
  • c A γ-hydrogen must be present; elimination produces a metallacyclobutane
  • d A β-hydrogen must be present and able to adopt a syn-coplanar M–C–C–H arrangement; elimination produces a metal hydride and a coordinated olefin
Answer: (d)

β-Hydride elimination requires: (1) a hydrogen on the β-carbon of the alkyl ligand, (2) a vacant coordination site on the metal, and (3) a syn-coplanar arrangement of the M–Cα–Cβ–H unit. The hydrogen transfers to the metal as a hydride while the alkyl becomes an olefin that remains coordinated. This reaction is both a common decomposition pathway for metal alkyls and a key step in catalytic cycles such as the Ziegler–Natta polymerization.

Catalytic Cycles

Questions 13–15
Housecroft & Sharpe, Ch. 24 Housecroft
Q13

The Monsanto process is an industrial Rh-catalyzed carbonylation of methanol to produce acetic acid. Which sequence correctly describes the key catalytic steps?

  • a Ligand substitution → β-hydride elimination → reductive elimination
  • b Oxidative addition of CH3I to [Rh(CO)2I2] → migratory insertion of CO → reductive elimination of CH3COI
  • c Olefin insertion → σ-bond metathesis → hydrogenolysis
  • d CO dissociation → nucleophilic attack on methanol → protonation
Answer: (b)

The Monsanto process uses [Rh(CO)2I2] as the active catalyst. Methanol is first converted to CH3I (by HI). The cycle then proceeds: (1) oxidative addition of CH3I to Rh(I), giving a Rh(III)–CH3 species; (2) migratory insertion of a cis CO into the Rh–CH3 bond to form an acyl intermediate; (3) reductive elimination of acetyl iodide (CH3COI), regenerating the Rh(I) catalyst. Hydrolysis of CH3COI gives acetic acid and regenerates HI.

Housecroft & Sharpe, Ch. 24 Housecroft
Q14

In olefin hydrogenation using Wilkinson's catalyst, [RhCl(PPh3)3], which step corresponds to oxidative addition and which to reductive elimination?

  • a Oxidative addition: olefin coordination; reductive elimination: PPh3 dissociation
  • b Oxidative addition: olefin insertion into Rh–H; reductive elimination: H2 release
  • c Oxidative addition: H2 adds to Rh(I) forming a Rh(III) dihydride; reductive elimination: the alkyl and hydride on Rh couple to release the alkane, regenerating Rh(I)
  • d Oxidative addition: Cl leaves the metal; reductive elimination: the alkane coordinates to Rh
Answer: (c)

The catalytic cycle of Wilkinson's catalyst involves: (1) dissociation of one PPh3 to open a coordination site; (2) oxidative addition of H2 to the 14e Rh(I) center, forming a Rh(III) dihydride (16e); (3) coordination of the olefin; (4) migratory insertion of the olefin into the Rh–H bond to give a Rh–alkyl; (5) reductive elimination in which the remaining hydride and the alkyl couple to release the saturated alkane product, regenerating the Rh(I) catalyst.

JD Lee, Chapter 29 JD Lee
Q15

Olefin metathesis is a reaction in which C=C double bonds are broken and reformed. Which of the following correctly describes this reaction and its development?

  • a Metathesis involves a [2+2] cycloaddition with a metal carbene (alkylidene) to form a metallacyclobutane intermediate; Grubbs developed well-defined Ru-based catalysts that work under mild conditions (2005 Nobel Prize)
  • b Metathesis is an electrocyclic ring-closing reaction catalyzed by Pd(0); Grubbs developed the Pd catalyst
  • c Metathesis involves radical chain mechanisms catalyzed by Fe complexes; Grubbs optimized the radical initiator
  • d Metathesis is an acid-catalyzed proton transfer between two olefins; Grubbs identified the optimal Brønsted acid
Answer: (a)

Olefin metathesis proceeds through a metal carbene (alkylidene) intermediate, typically on Mo, W, or Ru centers. The mechanism involves [2+2] cycloaddition of the olefin with the M=C bond to form a metallacyclobutane, followed by [2+2] cycloreversion to produce a new olefin and a new metal carbene. Robert Grubbs (along with Chauvin and Schrock) received the 2005 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this work. Grubbs' Ru-based catalysts are air-tolerant and functional-group tolerant, making them widely used in organic synthesis and polymer chemistry.

Topic Complete

0 / 15

Organometallic Chemistry